Today ended like a dream, a series of surreal hours that – one after the other – confirmed some of the worst fears of sane tolerant people. I’m disappointed like I’ve never before been in the political process and a certain intolerance best exemplified by what had just happened. It was unbelievable. The president of the United States had called a press conference, cutting into all live shows around the country, to show a final definite proof that he was born in the country as he had always said he was: a long hand birth certificate. It was the first of any president.
For me, this is sad on many levels, and race had a very large role to play. A few minutes after the White House released said birth certificate which they had got on request from the records office in Hawaii to put the controversy to rest, media mogul Donald Trump – also a contender for the next election – went to a press conference not just taking credit for the disclosure but also asking for the president’s college transcripts thus casting doubts on his qualifications as well.
I am a firm believer in the inner goodness of every human being in spite of their colour. I approached this country and people with the same open mindedness and was – like everyone else around the world – ecstatic and absolved when Obama was elected in 2008 in spite of what many considered his biggest obstacle: the colour of his skin. And then, from then, disappointed as to how every criticism of his policies seemed to come with something more than just a mere disagreement with economic policies. The press conference by Mr. Trump exemplified for me an unfortunate culmination of an underlying culture of intolerance.
First he said the president wasn’t born where he said he was, then he said the president had paid over $2m to prevent himself from having to show the document. A few weeks ago, he said he had sent investigators to Hawaii and he “couldn’t believe what they’re finding.” This, we found, was a lie, as Anderson Cooper found out after sending his own reporters to Hawaii. It turned out that Trump’s men either haven’t been there, or haven’t spoken to any relevant people as they should have. Yet he kept hyping the issue up for ratings in the media. Today, as the document finally surfaced, you would think he would back down. No, “we will get experts to examine it,” he said. For a moment there, I remembered another third world country – Ivory Coast – where Laurent Gbagbo had used a similar case of citizenship to keep his opponent away from the political process for many years. Many years, thousands of lives, and a brutal civil war later, we know where Gbagbo now sleeps, and in what bad shape his country is. It’s not the perfect analogy, but it’s not too far off either. The script is the same: “show us your papers and we’d let you play.”
I don’t think that many Americans realize just how bad this reflects on the country to the rest of the world, and that makes it a little more unfortunate. I’m not American and may never try to be one. But seeing how the country treats its own and one of its best leaves very much to be desired. This piece published today puts it in very good perspective. (Thanks to Nneoma for the link)
1
Tomi at http://YourWebsite
I thought I was the only one who wondered at how his opponents kept harping on the most trivial issues. Its amazing that people keep making such vitriolic statements. Even with the release of this document, there are those who say its fake!
Methinks many more pressing issues need to be focused on and let the man be! I certainly hope that his critics rise above the pettiness they currently display!
Posted at April 28, 2011 on 8:55am.
2
Culturesoup at http://culturesoup.wordpress.com/
I agree with you about this unfortunate display. It’s stuff like this that keeps me away from news in general. Unlike Tomi, i don’t think this group of critics can ever rise above this pettiness because their fundamental problem is with who Obama is. For the fact that he is black, they cannot accept him as their president.
Posted at April 28, 2011 on 5:08pm.
3
Bola at http://YourWebsite
I wonder why a birth place outside the US is a knockout criteria. So, if a pregnant American citizen goes on a day-trip to a town just across the US-Canadian border, has an unexpected, early delivery and the child is born in Canada, that child will not be able to run for presidency even if the child was transferred to a US hospital on the day of birth and never ever left the country thereafter?
Posted at April 29, 2011 on 1:50am.
4
Kola at http://www.ktravula.com
This scenario makes me wonder too. I guess one can’t argue with a document of over four hundred years old. Or can one? Ask the Americans. They’re a peculiar people :).
Posted at April 30, 2011 on 12:29pm.