Picture this hypothetical scenario:
A woman, suspected by her husband to have been cheating on him, is infected with a hate charm meant to kill the first man who sleeps with her within a period of nine weeks (including her husband if he so becomes stupid as to make love to her within that period). But wait, that is not all. If within nine weeks no man does so, the woman dies too, so it ends up as a lose-lose situation for the woman in question, and a sadistic win for the man depending on what his motives are.
Now picture this further conflict in the story: the woman, by some unexplainable coincidences, discovers that she has this charm on her, and later that her husband was the one who had put it there, since – on being given the chance to help her get it off in the presence of spiritualists waiting to remedy the situation once and for all – he had run scared, couldn’t do it and then didn’t deny his heinous crime when eventually confronted. Time is running down and she has only seven days to live, what should the woman do? Divorce, it would seem, is already a granted option. Here were the others…
a. Sleep with a stranger, a charming medical doctor, who has volunteered himself as the guinea pig for two reasons: He doesn’t believe in the existence of such charm anyway, and he had an eye for the woman since a long time.
b. Wait it out, disbelieving in such crap as a hate charm, especially since she is not from that culture that believes in such a thing as magun as the charm is called. The risk is a 50-50 chance that she might die.
This is the subject of a class movie that we just saw to the end on Monday. The 2001 movie is titled THUNDERBOLT (Magun) and is an adaptation of a story by Yoruba writer Adebayo Faleti, and directed by multi award-winning director Tunde Kelani. Magun (literally meaning “don’t climb”) is an old and notorious myth in the Yoruba culture, and it has been credited for all the strange or spooky things that have happened to people engaged in illicit affairs. The scientific verification of the curse is impossible since no one has ever claimed responsibility for its activation, nor narrated experiences of its infection. The men concubines are supposed to die immediately afterwards, and the woman shamed. Thus so far, it exists purely at the level of myths, literature, movies and academic papers. The movie is instructive in the way it brings the western culture into a spectacular clash with the local traditional medicine, and superstition, and how the love triangle of death, intrigue and betrayal was resolved in the end.
We saw this movie last semester in class, and the students loved it. This semester, they did too, but there was at least one objection to the way adultery was portrayed as the solution to the death triangle. “I just don’t believe that it is right,” the student said, having walked out of the class at the last scene where a medical doctor who didn’t believe in “such crap” had volunteered himself as the guinea pig to test the veracity of the myth and thus get a chance to write an academic paper about its demystification. “It is a marriage for God’s sake,” she said, not really in these exact words “and marriage is a sacred institution. To allow such portrayal of adultery as a solution to something that is purely mythical is barbaric and ridiculous.” And for a moment, it seemed that the fiction on the screen had taken a life of its own out in the real world of the classroom. What she didn’t see in the last moments of the movie as she walked out in protest was how the guinea pig medical doctor who had put the myth to test had come face-to-face with immediate death thus adding veracity to the myth, at least for the benefit of the story. Much of the conflict in the movie however was about that clash of civilization and tradition, and the extent of human tolerance, love, respect and curiosity.
I had brought it along from Nigeria because it was one of the my favourite Nigerian Yoruba movies, because of its drama, and because of the way it explores a cultural myth and its interaction with a modernizing world. I recommend it for watching for everyone, and not just because one of my (now late) Professors was one of the main characters, but because it raises valid questions of what is to be done when one is suddenly confronted with the a life-threatening, time-bound discovery that the world is not all good and kind.
PS: Said student is the only married student in the class, which could make it easier – or not – to understand her objection. That said, I’m glad that the movie provoked such a discussion. Theatre/Fiction tends to do just that.
1
Yemi Adesanya at http://YourWebsite
Solution option c. seduce and sleep with the husband’s brother – then they’ll be even.
I need to see this movie again.
Posted at March 3, 2010 on 2:13am.
2
Temitayo at http:/http://bookaholicblog.blogspot.com/
Classic Mainframe movie/film. Movie or film? Not sure I know the difference. I love it for many reasons but I think one surely is the combination of traditional and contemporary/scientific issues. To the scientist, Magun does not exist, so how will it have a scientific solution? You remember the Doctor-Boyfriend who would go all the way? And ha the power of African science, lemme call it that! And somewhat about a confluence of modern and traditional science. In response to your student–it’s someone’s life for God’s sake 🙁 And someone would also respond that it’s also about the doctor’s life. Now that’s how you know a good movie–it stirs conversations, long after it’s gone! And it’s never really gone. Really it’s about life-threatening choices as you pointed out.Will watch it again any day 🙂
Posted at March 3, 2010 on 10:42pm.
3
Sula at http://YourWebsite
Your P.S helps a lot to understand such a reaction… As a couch psychologist, I would suggest that it might be the reason why the student was so upset.
I love the idea of exploring our beliefs and/or our understandings of them through the eyes of a filmmaker… Never heard of the movie but it’s interesting as it makes the woman in charge of her “decision”… My question is this: if a husband (or partner) orders the Magun for their spouse because they suspect them of cheating, does that automatically imply that they are done with said person? It doesn’t seem to have any outlet if said spouse is not cheating in the first place. Let’s say the person is innocent, what happens then? They still die? Then, the spouse who orders the Magun is definitely trying to get rid of their SO (and I can understand why it could be upsetting… :))
Posted at March 3, 2010 on 10:45pm.
4
Clarissa at http://clarissasbox.blogspot.com/
I’m married (and not for the first time) and the movie would not upset me. The problem is not with the married people. It’s just that we are in the Midwest of the US, which is a very puritanical area of a very puritanical country.
Posted at March 4, 2010 on 3:49pm.
5
Kola Tubosun at http://www.ktravula.com
You’re quite right Clarissa. I have considered that possibility, but then I realized that most or all of the other students in the class are also from the Midwest, and they didn’t respond that way at all. In fact, they seemed to have enjoyed the movie, and found the objector’s behaviour a bit strange.
I have kept an open mind in the whole matter, and yesterday after class I got her to talk more about her objection and she said that it was both a religious and a principled one. She is a born again Christian, she said, and would normally turn off the television at home if anything remotely challenging to her faith and purity of mind comes on the screen. I had once shown them a clip from FELA, the famous Nigerian Afrobeat musician’s stage performance, and she mentioned yesterday that she had objected to that too because of the “inappropriate dressing” of the singer and his back-up dancers on stage, but that she stayed through it for the sake of the class.
It was interesting for me to see her objection from a Christian (or as you said puritanical) or principled point of view that was in this case at a clash with the requirement for students to keep an open mind in class, but in the end, I appreciate it as a call never to take anything for granted (in America).
PS: She is also the oldest in class, at least older than fifty.
Posted at March 4, 2010 on 6:35pm.
6
Clarissa at http://clarissasbox.blogspot.com
“She is a born again Christian, she said, and would normally turn off the television at home if anything remotely challenging to her faith and purity of mind comes on the screen. ”
-Oy, if a person’s faith is so weak that it can be compromised by something they see on tv, that is cause for worry. 🙂
I’m so happy that no student has come to me with anything so weird because I’m not sure I would have kept my cool. 🙂 I might have started quoting the constitution back at them. 🙂
Posted at March 4, 2010 on 10:42pm.
7
Abi at http://abiwritesatnight.blogspot.com/
I particulaly love Yemi’s response.
If a husband decided that the best way to ‘eliminate’ a competitor or the wife in particular is to ‘lace’ her with magun , then the woman de facto ( I hope I used that term right there) should extend the courtesy to his brother.
All jokes apart, it’s still a mystery to me why in Africa, a woman’s adultery is considered the greater evil. In God’s eyes and yes I’m a born again Christian, both are sin and punishable with the same consequences.
It is an interesting thing that somehow in time, society imposes a set of rules amendable to appease gender ,race, orientation and creed.
Posted at January 31, 2011 on 9:09am.
8
m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=354094234648705&id=100484630009668&set=a.152919604766170.37823.100484630009668&refid=20&_ft_=fbid.354094251315370 at http://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=354094234648705&id=100484630009668&set=a.152919604766170.37823.100484630009668&refid=20&_ft_=fbid.354094251315370
m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=354094234648705&id=100484630009668&set=a.152919604766170.37823.100484630009668&refid=20&_ft_=fbid.354094251315370
Posted at April 29, 2012 on 3:55am.