It’s funny that before the recent controversy about the Cordoba House in NY city a block away from the former World Trade Centre buildings, my imagination never successfully pictured a mosque in the United States. Of course it’s a no-brainer, there has to have been a mosque somewhere. Or where did Malcolm X, Mohammed Ali, and other countless immigrants from the Middle East do their Friday prayers. Somehow I must have always thought that they prayed in designated places in their homes. Of course, now I know different. Even Wikipedia has a list of all the mosques in the country. So when I had to drive one of the current Arabic teachers on the Fulbright program to a place to pray on Friday, wiki was there to help.
The problem was, it wasn’t called a mosque even though that was what it was. It was called an Islamic Community Centre. What on earth is that? When we went to a Cathedral, it was called a cathedral. When we visited a Synagogue, it was called as such. But when we went to the mosque, it was called something else. It was not just a place for socialization. It was a Mosque – a praying ground. When did it become a crime to call something by its own name? Only in America, perhaps. The only consolation is that, by any other name, the building remained visible for all to see with a minaret pointing to heaven. On the one hand, I am proud of the country living up to its creed of freedom for all (including freedom from discrimination on the basis of religion, and the freedom of worship). This is beyond impressive and it speaks to diversity, courage and maturity. On the other hand, I’m disgusted by the hypocrisy that would make a mosque be called by any other name for any reason in order to adjust to the discomfort of a needlessly frightened society.
(Click image to enlarge)
1
Kingsley Ogbuji at http://www.twitter.com/lordkings
Is not the choice of nomenclature at the discretion of the proponents of the religion? Hence, the hypocrisy is attributable to them not to the United States. Religion should be practiced without fear not under guise in any society that upholds freedom of religion unless there is some hidden agenda on the part of the practitioners.
Posted at October 17, 2010 on 7:36pm.
2
Clarissa at http://clarissasbox.blogspot.com/
It’s curious that in your posts about the church and the synagogue you go inside these buildings and these religions. In the case of the mosque, you talk about the building and the religion from the outside. The post is about the name and the perception of the building. But there is nothing about the people inside the building and their beliefs.
This is a tendency that I always observe in any discussion of Islam by progressive, liberal people.
Posted at October 18, 2010 on 10:28am.
3
Kola at http://www.ktravula.com
Ha, but you are right! I’ve thought about that irony myself and I’ve not found the right words to absolve myself of the dereliction of journalistic duty to participate and to report. This makes for interesting study.
Posted at October 18, 2010 on 10:31am.
4
Clarissa at http://clarissasbox.blogspot.com/
“Ha, but you are right!”
-Ain’t I always, my friend. 🙂
I forgot to bring your candy today but I’ll bring it on Wednesday.
Posted at October 18, 2010 on 1:18pm.
5
Chris at http://YourWebsite
I just wanted to say that none of us went to visit the mosque because it wasn’t part of our original itinerary. Our friend went to pray there before our travels began and we just picked him up. The only plans we had for travel were to see the Cathedral Basilica. That is why the mosque was viewed from the outside. The trip to the synagogue and Jewish religious service was because of a random invite from a friend at the last moment. 🙂
Posted at October 29, 2010 on 4:02am.
6
Kola at http://www.ktravula.com
Thanks Chris.
Posted at November 1, 2010 on 5:51pm.