Tyler Perry’s latest movie is titled Why Did I Get Married Too, a sequel to the first brilliant drama Why Did I Get Married. But while the first part was brilliant, logical and very comical and stimulating, this sequel fails like the very many other sequels that seek to make money off a first brilliant idea. And while I don’t hate all sequels (Meet the Fockers lives up to expectation of a good sequel after Meet the Parents, as did Simba’s Pride and Lion King 1 1/2). But if I was asked to summarize this Tyler Perry movie in one word, it would be: “heck!”.
Don’t get me wrong, it was good as far as cinematography, characterization and acting are concerned. It even has some great laugh-out-loud scenes. But for plot, I give it a big thumbs down. And I am a Tyler Perry fan. I have seen and loved some of his earlier works like Madea’s Family Reunion and The Diary of a Mad Black Woman. I have even seen the stage performance of this Why Did I Get Married. But now after spending my money and two hours of my life in a cinema, I am left with wondering: Why? You don’t always have to make a sequel. But when you do, why not at least give the audience some credit for intelligence and the ability to discern when they’re being taken for a ride.
I know that many people, especially women will crucify me for taking this position, but luckily I am not alone. If you choose to pay your money to see it, note that the story will neither inspire nor even entertain you in any intelligent way. You will get sentimentality, but not brilliance. You will probably wish that you had gone to see Desperate Housewives instead. At least, that one is honest about its intention to sometimes take your intelligence for granted with exaggerated coincidences and plot twists. And Desperate Housewives does have some brilliant lines as well as plots. In this Tyler Perry movie, all the four couples in the first part have gotten back together for another annual retreat. What happens afterwards – I insist – is a matter for tv series and soaps, and not for the movies. As thoroughly superb as her performance in this disappointing flick is, I’m sorry to say that Janet Jackson won’t be deserving an Oscar yet. And it won’t be her fault. It will be the poor script that the director has given her to play. Maybe Mr. Perry should consider turning the “movie” into a tv series, and we can hope for him to win his Emmys someday. Until then, let me go mourn the loss of two precious hours that I will never ever get back. 🙁
1
Abimbola Adunni at http://YourWebsite
I can imagine what the sequel will be. Sequels kill the main story. Check out Shrek, Ali Baba and the 40 thieves etc
I don’t think I want to see it sef.
Posted at April 4, 2010 on 3:23pm.
2
Kola Tubosun at http://www.ktravula.com
Did you hear that Shrek is coming out with another sequel?
Posted at April 5, 2010 on 12:21pm.
3
Clarissa at http://clarissasbox.blogspot.com/
“I know that many people, especially women will crucify me for taking this position”
-Why? Is there some tendency among women to like sequels??
Posted at April 5, 2010 on 11:22am.
4
Kola Tubosun at http://www.ktravula.com
No, but from the “ooohs” and “aaaahs” in the cinema whenever a half naked upper bodies of the well-built men in the movie came on the screen – which was a lot of times (and this has made me suspect that the writer/director has made this purposely to appeal to the sentiments and fantasies of some women) – I suspect that they enjoyed it immensely. In any case, I already have at least one woman say that it was such a lovely movie. What can I say? Tyler Perry knows what some women want. Apologies for making a generalization.
Posted at April 5, 2010 on 12:06pm.
5
Kola Tubosun at http://www.ktravula.com
And, by the way, sometime last week, I noticed the following search item in my Analytics, twice: “Olga Bezhanova is from…”
I think someone is looking for you :D.
Posted at April 5, 2010 on 12:10pm.